Atul Kohli’s ‘State-Directed Development: Political power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery’ is a study which discusses the patterns. Atul Kohli (AK): As I began my research in the s, the prevailing policy orthodoxy was that economic growth in developing countries would. Kamilia Lahrichi. Author: Atul Kohli Title: State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery, Cambirdge.

Author: Dabar Akijind
Country: Philippines
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 2 January 2010
Pages: 346
PDF File Size: 8.73 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.81 Mb
ISBN: 244-1-93913-840-1
Downloads: 38045
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Maujas

Thirdly, neo-patrimonial states are also structurally weak and fail to perform their duties. Anacenaj rated it it was amazing Mar 27, Collectively, these four countries also provided geographical diversity from Asia to Africa to Latin America.

Alison Sprague rated it it was amazing Apr 23, For example, Britain colonised Nigeria and India but the two countries inherited different types of state. To try and answer that question and address why Korea had a good government and Nigeria did not, my research was forced back into history. Be the first to ask a question directee State-Directed Development.

In conclusion, Kohil looks at devleopment three different types of state and evaluate their capacity in promoting industrialisation and development. As a matter of fact, fascism espoused the ideology of a strong government that emphasises the nation-state and tames rirected citizen who opposes industrialisation. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Aug 23, Ashley Mebert rated it liked it.


State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery

The political regime can take the form of a democracy or an authoritarian government. How can one explain variations in the rates of industrialization and economic achievement? Trivia About State-Directed De How serious an impact does colonialism in the first half of the 20th century have on these countries today in the 21st century? Notify me of new comments via email.

Media Features

Following a Weberian perspective, Atul Kohli pays special attention to the role of state institutions and society cohesion. It was more of a policy orthodoxy and less of an statf in the scholarly community. But the fact is that once they differed, they left long term legacies that have continued.

He deliberately picked populous states because they can develop autonomous economies. Was there scholarly consensus on the issue?

Atul Kohli – State-directed development by Kajsa Åström on Prezi

What grabbed my attention was the people in gas masks watching. One important point that the author demonstrates through a well-researched historical analysis is that each of the four countries studied exhibits the characteristics of more than one state pattern. In order to explain why some states took specific forms of organisation, we must look at countries colonial pasts.

Why have some developing countries industrialized and become more prosperous rapidly while others have not? I qualify that right from the beginning. Oskars Baltais rated it really liked it Oct 29, What constitutes effective intervention and what the patterns of those state interventions are the main issues I have analyzed in State-Directed Development.


There is high concentration of political authority which remains at the top and favours capital accumulation. As I began my research in the s, the prevailing policy orthodoxy was that economic growth in developing countries would be achieved mainly by opening their economies and by minimizing the role governments play in those economies.

No wonder it is hard to manage! After having read the book, I can say this mural is a pretty fitting choice for the cover artwork. Cohesive capitalist state devleopment Represented by his case study on South Korea.

However, the long term legacies have varied.

I also thought it would be instructive to get some sense decelopment states that were utter economic disasters, such as those less developed states in Africa. I have not been persuaded by that argument.

I thought examining both success and failure from a similar perspective would provide a good understanding of the dynamics behind each case. Lacked in inter-state comparisons and state-model abstractions.